Revision From Life: Take It From the Top Again Nora Ephron
REVISION AND LIFE: Take Information technology FROM THE TOP- Once again
See the article in its original context from
Nov 9, 1986
,
Department 7 , Folio
7Buy Reprints
TimesMachine is an exclusive benefit for dwelling delivery and digital subscribers.
About the Archive
This is a digitized version of an article from The Times'south print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not modify, edit or update them.
Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems; nosotros are standing to work to improve these archived versions.
IHAVE been asked to write something for a textbook that is meant to teach college students something nearly writing and revision. I am happy to practice this because I believe in revision. I have also been asked to save the early drafts of whatever I write, presumably to evidence these students the actual process of revision. This too I am happy to do. On the other hand, I suspect that there is only so much you can teach higher students most revision; a gift for revision may exist a developmental phase - like a 2-year-old'south sudden power to place one block on top of another - that comes along somewhat later, in one's mid-twenty'southward, say; most people may not be peculiarly good at it, or even interested in it, until and then.
When I was in college, I revised cipher. I wrote out my papers in longhand, typed them up and turned them in. It would never accept crossed my listen that what I had produced was but a showtime draft and that I had more work to practice; the idea was to go to the cease, and once you had got to the finish you were finished. The same thinking, I might add, practical in life:
I went pell-mell through my four years in college without a thought about whether I ought to practice annihilation differently; the thought was to go to the end - to become out of school and become a journalist.
Which I became, in fairly short order. I learned every bit a journalist to revise on borderline. I learned to write an article a paragraph at a time - and to plough it in a paragraph at a time - and I arrived at the kind of writing and revising I exercise, which is basically a kind of typing and retyping. I am a great believer in this technique for the elementary reason that I type faster than the air current. What I generally exercise is to beginning an article and get as far as I tin can - sometimes no farther in than a sentence or 2 - earlier running out of steam, ripping the piece of paper from the typewriter and starting all over over again. I type over and over until I have got the commencement of the piece to the point where I am happy with information technology. I and then am prepare to plunge into the body of the article itself. This plunge usually requires something known equally a transition. I approach a transition by completely retyping the opening of the article leading up to it in the hope that the ferocious speed of my typing will somehow catapult me into the next section of the piece. This does not work - what in fact catapults me into the adjacent section is a concrete thought about what the next section ought to be virtually - but until I have the idea the typing keeps me busy, and keeps me from feeling something known as blocked. Typing and retyping as if you know where you're going is a version of what therapists tell yous to do when they propose that yous endeavour irresolute from the outside in - that if yous tin can't master the full commitment to whatever change y'all want to make, you tin at least exercise all the extraneous things connected with information technology, which make information technology that much easier to become in that location. I was 25 years old the offset fourth dimension a therapist Nora Ephron is the author of ''Heartburn.'' suggested that I try changing from the outside in. In those days, I used to spend quite a lot of time lying awake at nighttime wondering what I should have said earlier in the evening and revising my lines. I mention this not just considering it's a mode of illustrating that a gift for revision is practically instinctive, merely besides (again) because it's possible that a 18-carat power at it doesn't really come into play until one is older - or at least older than 25, when it seemed to me that all that was required in my life and my work was the risk to change a few lines.
In my 30'southward, I began to write essays, ane a month for Esquire mag, and I am not exaggerating when I say that in the course of writing a short essay - ane,500 words, that's only six double-spaced typewritten pages - I often used 300 or 400 pieces of typing paper, so often did I type and retype and catapult and recatapult myself, sometimes on each retyping moving not fifty-fifty a sentence further from the spot I had reached the last fourth dimension through. At the same time, though, I was polishing what I had already written: as I struggled with the middle of the commodity, I kept putting the start through the typewriter; every bit I approached the catastrophe, the middle got its turn. (This is a kind of polishing that the word processor all merely eliminates, which is why I don't employ 1. Word processors get in possible for a author to change the sentences that conspicuously demand changing without having to retype the remainder, but I believe that you can't always tell whether a sentence needs work until it rises up in revolt against your fingers as you retype it.) By the fourth dimension I had produced what you might phone call a first draft - an entire commodity with a beginning, middle and end - the commencement was in more like 45th typhoon, the heart in 20th, and the terminate was almost newborn. For this reason, the beginnings of my essays are considerably better written than the ends, although I like to think no i always notices this just me.
As I learned the essay class, writing became harder for me. I was finding a personal style, a vocalization if you volition, a way of writing that looked chatty and informal. That wasn't the difficult office - the hard part was that having found a vocalisation, I had to piece of work hard month to calendar month not to seem as if I were repeating myself. At this indicate in this essay it volition not surprise you lot to larn that the aforementioned sort of thing was operating in my life. I don't mean that my life had become harder - but that information technology was becoming articulate that I had many more choices than had occurred to me when I was marching through my xx's. I no longer lost slumber over what I should have said. Not that I didn't intendance - information technology was just that I had moved to a new airplane of belatedly-night anxiety: I now wondered what I should have done. Whole areas of possible revision opened before me. What should I have done instead? What could I have done? What if I hadn't washed it the way I did? What if I had a take chances to do it over? What if I had a chance to do it over as a different person? These were the sorts of questions that kept me awake and led me into fiction, which at the very least (the level at which I practise it) is a chance to rework the events of your life so that you give the illusion of being the intelligence at the centre of information technology, simultaneously managing to sideslip in all the lines that occurred to yous after. Fiction, I suppose, is the ultimate shot at revision.
At present I am in my 40's and I write screenplays. Screenplays - if they are made into movies - are essentially collaborations, and movies are not a author's medium, we all know this, and I don't desire to dwell on the craft of screenwriting except insofar as it relates to revision. Because the moment you end piece of work on a script seems to be determined not by whether you recall the draft is practiced merely simply by whether shooting is near to begin: if it is, you go to telephone call your script a final draft; and if it's not, you tin can ever write another revision. This might seem to be a hateful fashion to live, merely the odd matter is that it's somehow comforting; as long as you're revising, the project isn't dead. And by the same token, neither are you. Information technology was, every bit it happens, while thinking about all this ane recent sleepless night that I figured out how to write this particular essay. I say ''recent'' in society to give a sense of immediacy and energy to the preceding sentence, but the truth is that I am finishing this article four months after the sleepless nighttime in question, and the letter of the alphabet asking me to write it, from George Miller of the University of Delaware, arrived almost two years agone, and so for all I know Mr. Miller has managed to gather his textbook on revision without me.
Oh, well. That's how it goes when you beginning thinking about revision. That'due south the danger of it, in fact. You can spend so much fourth dimension thinking about how to switch things around that the main outcome has passed y'all by. But information technology doesn't matter. Because past the time y'all achieve eye age, y'all want more than annihilation for things not to come to an end; and as long as yous're yet revising, they don't.
I'1000 sorry to terminate so morbidly - dancing as I am effectually the subject of death - simply at that place are advantages to it. For one affair, I have managed to move fairly effortlessly and logically from the beginning of this piece through the center and to the cease. And for another, I am able to close with an exhortation, something I rarely manage, which is this: Revise now, before it'south too late.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/1986/11/09/books/revision-and-life-take-it-from-the-top-again.html
0 Response to "Revision From Life: Take It From the Top Again Nora Ephron"
Post a Comment